Scheme to expand fluoridation has been approved, but health campaigner says the poor will suffer the negative health impacts of ‘NHS-sanctioned treatment.’
Protesters march against the use of fluoride in drinking water in San Francisco on Feb. 22, 2013. Shutterstock
Updated:
A health campaigner has raised concerns about the lack of meaningful public consultation by the government before it approved the biggest expansion of water fluoridation in England since the 1980s.
The NHS announced on Friday it would press ahead with plans to add the fluoride compound to an additional 1.6 million people across the north-east, which it says will help tackle dental decay in children, particularly in poorer areas.
But Joy Warren, founder of the UK Fluoride Free Alliance (UKFFA), told The Epoch Times that far from reducing health inequalities, the plans could increase them because of the negative health impacts which dozens of scientific studies suggest are being caused by fluoridated water.
“We were told these studies were old arguments and we couldn’t submit them again,” she said of the public consultation process.
“But we were also told that [they] need more research, and so they contradicted themselves.”
Lack of Public Awareness
Warren said the consultation process was not meaningful due to a lack of public awareness and the lack of media reporting of the possible negative health impacts of fluoridation.
Related Stories
“We knew that most of the people in the north east never got to find out about it because it was so poorly advertised … and if you’ve got a media shutdown, you are never going to get anywhere.”
Two villages from China that essentially only differ in fluoride concentrations show discrepancies in the IQ of the children, a study found. Epoch Health
Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in water and some foods, but the compound that is added is derived from an industrial hazardous waste product of fertilizer manufacturing, which is washed out of chimneys in the Middle East and transported in tankers.
It is added to only around 5 percent of the worldwide water supply, with most developed nations rejecting the practice of fluoridation, including the vast majority of Western Europe.
Fluoridation in the UK began in 1964 without public consultation after researchers found that people had less tooth decay in areas with higher natural fluoride levels in the drinking water.
England has a current fluoridation rate of around 11 percent, with the compound added to the water supply of some 6 million people in the north east, parts of the west Midlands including Birmingham, and parts of the east Midlands.
The consultation proposed that the programme should expand across the north-east to Darlington, Durham, Gateshead, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Newcastle, Northumberland, North Tyneside, Redcar and Cleveland, South Tyneside, Stockton and Sunderland.
This will be the first significant expansion of water fluoridation in England since the 1980s.
Benefits Have Declined
A review published last October concluded the benefits of fluoridating water supplies appear to have declined since the 1970s when fluoride toothpaste became widely available in the UK.
Overall, water fluoridation “may lead to slightly more children being free of tooth decay” and “may lead to slightly less tooth decay in children’s baby teeth,” according to the updated Cochrane Review.
Warren said, “It is far more beneficial to teach children how to brush their teeth properly than to fluoridate the water, which can cause dental problems like fluorosis.”
Professor Sir Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, has dismissed safety concerns over fluoridation, condemning what he called “exaggerated and unevidenced” claims about health risks.
Secretary of health and human services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., testifies before the Senate Committee on Finance on Capitol Hill in Washington on Jan. 29, 2025. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
California Ruling and RFK Jr
Warren believes it was “negligent” of the UK government not to take into account a ruling by a California judge last September that fluoride can lower children’s IQ—effectively branding it a neurotoxin—following a high profile court case.
“In America, the level of fluoride is point seven milligrammes per litre … in England, it’s one milligramme—one third higher—so you can imagine that our IQ is even more damaged in the west midlands and Newcastle and other fluoridated areas?”
“If the government hasn’t taken any notice of [the ruling], it’s criminal, it’s negligence,” she said, adding that the NHS constitution makes clear that people are allowed to refuse their consent to medical treatment, which is what fluoridation effectively is.”
Warren believes that fluoridation amounts to “forced medicine” as “only those who can afford to pay for bottled water and filtration systems,” and have awareness of possible health implications will do so.
Following the San Francisco case, Judge Edward Chen ordered the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to strengthen regulations for fluoride in drinking water, saying the compound poses an “unreasonable potential risk” to children’s developing brains at levels that are currently typical nationwide.
Chen sided with several advocacy groups, saying they had established during the trial that fluoride posed a risk of harm sufficient to require a regulatory response by the EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act.
“The scientific literature in the record provides a high level of certainty that a hazard is present; fluoride is associated with reduced IQ,” Chen wrote in his judgment.
Secretary for Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr has said he wants to end the fluoridation of water in the United States because it is “a very bad way to deliver it into our systems” as it gets into the bloodstream, as opposed to fluoridated toothpaste which coats the teeth but is ingested in miniscule quantities.
President Donald Trump has indicated he will look at recommending the removal of fluoride from the water supply, although the decision to add the compound is currently made at local level in the United States.
Warren said the UKFFA has appointed a barrister with the intention of bringing a class action lawsuit against the UK Government over alleged health harms caused by fluoridation, and the group plans to fight the proposed expansion in the north-east.
There is a legal obligation for the government to monitor the health impacts of fluoridation every four years, with the next report due to be published in 2026, ahead of when the scheme for the north-east is expected to be implemented.
